Exegetical Report 2 – Kalpana Sharma
I.
Outline:
i.
Jesus a better lawgiver
redefined Sabbath observance. (eating, working, lawful/unlawful) (Matt.
12:1-15))
A.
Jesus and his disciples
pass through a grain field on Sabbath. (v. 1a) Hungry disciples pluck grains
and eat (v. 1b.)
B.
Pharisees notice, "inform"
and remind Jesus of 'unlawful' activities that the disciples were engaged in.
(v2)
C.
Response and 'discourse':
Jesus counter-argues and reminds them of a past seemingly 'unlawful' action and
other older traditions. He takes it as a teaching moment and puts the Sabbath with
the circumstance in its proper perspective from God's viewpoint. (v. 3-5)
D.
Jesus reminds us of God's
desire for mercy and not sacrifice. (v.7)
E.
Jesus claims to be of more
significance and above the law (v. 6. and 8).
ii.
The Sabbath issue continues
with the healing scenario. (9-14)
A. Jesus transitions from the grain fields to the synagogue. (v9)
B. Pharisees see a man with a withered hand, instigate whether
healing was lawful on Sabbath (v. 10), and take the Sabbath legalism to a new
level with the sole intent of accusing Jesus.
C. Jesus responds, probes, and still uses it as a teaching moment
by narrating a story and reaffirming the lawful deeds to be done on Sabbath
(v.11-12). Jesus calls the man to stretch out his hand (v. 13a). The man
stretches out; the hand is restored like the other. (v.13b).
D. Pharisees who opposed healing, go out and [on the very Sabbath)
have no qualms about devising a plot to kill Jesus (V14).
II.
Exegetical Issues
A. Boundaries, Placement, Function of the Passage in its Context
1. The most-immediate section before 12:1-14 passage:
i) Compared to many added rules and regulations of Pharisees, Jesus'
call in Matt.11:28-30 to the weary and those burdened with heavy load, offers a
viable alternative. His yoke is easy and his burden is light.
ii) The first encounter is the grain field, and the second is the
Synagogue. Sabbath law redefining occurs by 'breaking' the rigid pharisaic laws
in both incidents. Talbert mentions that the place changes but not the dispute
(Talbert, 152, kindle).
iii) The later passage after 12:1-14 is about Jesus being aware of
their plot to kill him and departing. People continue to follow. He continues
to heal them (v15) and, understandably, orders them not to make him known (v.
16).
iv) The passage 12:17-21 quotes prophet Isa.42:1-7 fulfillment of
the "Beloved, well-pleasing, chosen Servant who is about doing justice to
gentiles. He does not argue or cry in the streets protesting. He does not break the
bruised reed nor quench a smoldering wick until justice wins. Gentiles hope in
his name," fits well with 11:28-30's easier yoke, lighter burden offer,
and mercy taking over rigidity in 12:1-14.
2. The immediate context: Chapter 11: 1-30 is about the unbelieving
folks unwilling to listen to John the Baptist, who solemnly presented the
message or to Jesus, who came 'eating and drinking' (11:17-19). The woes were
pronounced on the unbelieving cities (11: 20:24). Jesus thanks the Father for
hiding from the intelligent and revealing to infants and asserts knowing and
being close to God. (11: 25-27) Later, Jesus
continues the healing ministry. He is accused of working with Beelzebub, the
demon's ruler.
3. The larger context:
i) Jesus challenged a made-up legalistic system that kept people in
bondage, redefined it, and offered a doable alternative.
ii) The opponents' hypocrisy, unbelief, and unwillingness are
revealed. Neither fasting nor feasting would convince them. They justify
plotting to kill, but not heal on Sabbath.
4. The function is as a better lawgiver Jesus' assertive
action with an authority. Do away with legalistic unfounded ungodly rules and
instead do the necessary and good on the Sabbath. Moreover, see God's heart for
mercy and not sacrifice.
B. Textual/Translation Problems.
·
In Lk. 6:1-5 and Mk.
2:23-28, Jesus defends only with David's incident. Matthew adds other details
of older traditions from Ex. 25:30, Lev. 24:5-9, Deut.23:25 as well as Hos.6:6
about God's desire for mercy. Matthew's Jesus asserts self-preeminence.
·
Regarding the man with the
withered hand, Luke writes about Pharisees watching and seeing what Jesus would
do to accuse him. Luke records Jesus knowing their thoughts and asks the man to
stand up.
·
In Matthew, the Pharisees
ask if it is lawful to heal on the Sabbath. In Mk. 3 and Lk. 6:6-11, Jesus
instigates whether it is lawful to heal on the Sabbath.
·
Mark records the Pharisees'
silence and Jesus' anger at their hard hearts.
·
Lk. 6:5 records Jesus
probing: if their child or ox had fallen in a well and if they would not
immediately pull it out on Sabbath. Matthean Jesus asks if a sheep falls into
the pit.
·
Mk. 2:26 mentioned Abiathar
as a High Priest when David was given the holy bread to eat, while 1 Sam.
21:1-6 narrative mentions Abimelech as the priest giving bread. Bart Ehrman
wrote a paper about Abiathar, and Abimelech discrepancy using historical criticism.
His professor stating that perhaps Mark or Jesus were wrong on this affected Ehrman's
stand on defending the Bible's inerrancy tradition.
·
In Mk. 2:27, Markan Jesus
clarifies that the Sabbath was made for humankind; humankind was not made for
the Sabbath. The system is for us; we are not there for the system. Jesus
openly challenges the legalistically rigid tradition.
·
While Matt.12:15 records
Jesus departed, Mk 3:7, records Jesus departed to the Sea of Galilee side, and Lk.
6:12 mentions that in those days, he went to the mountain to pray for an
overnight prayer time.
C. Issues of Interpretation.
Boxall mentions, "The
Pharisaic interpretation of the Sabbath laws, by contrast, lacks mercy and
would permit the disciples to starve. This distinctive Matthean version of the
story seems carefully designed to minimize any suggestion that Jesus or his
disciples violate the Sabbath per se."[1]
Talbert writes, "Work on the
Sabbath was forbidden (Exod. 20:10; Deut. 5:14). Harvesting on the Sabbath was
considered to be working on the Sabbath (Exod. 34:21; m. Shabb. 7.2). The
Pharisees in 12:1–8 apparently regard picking the grain heads as harvesting and
hence as unlawful work." Talbert further mentions: "Either the
argument of 12:1–8 aims to highlight Jesus’s authority to define appropriate
Sabbath behavior, or the unit functions to depict Jesus’s discernment of the
Sabbath’s intent. To decide between them, one must focus on Jesus’s reply in
12:3–8. Formally, Jesus’s response consists of two examples from Scripture
(12:3–4; 12:5–6) followed by the basis for his position (God’s words, 12:7) and
ending with his summation of the argument (12:8; J. Hicks 1984). Human need
takes precedence."[2]
The issue was still unresolved. The
synagogue has a setting with a withered hand man, question, response, and
reaction. When the opponents in Matthew ask the question whether healing is
lawful on Sabbath, they are set in their rabbinic tradition that consistently
forbade any work or stretching except when life was in danger, "this
overrides the Sabbath (m. Yoma 8.6)"[3]. When
Jesus talked about a sheep, rabbinic tradition allowed assisting the sheep to
get out but "Qumran community regulations were more severe: do not lift
the animal out (CD 11.13–14).[4] Of
course, the animal will be lifted out. Any sensible person understands Jesus'
response. Jesus just asks to stretch out the hand without touching or raising
the hand. God healed him. Jesus created havoc in their system and they went
away angry conspiring to kill him. Did Jesus just flee, go to the mountain to
pray overnight or go to the side of the sea of Galilee and continue his
ministry of healing?
D. Use of Sources or Tradition
·
To engage in a thought-provoking
debate, the author makes both parties use older traditions, like conflicts in
Greco-Roman traditions and scenarios.
·
The author shows Pharisees'
objections using the literal and rigid traditional interpretation of Ex.20:8-11
Sabbath keeping.
·
Jesus implies Deut. 23: 25,
"If you go into your neighbor's standing grain, you may pluck the ears
with your hand, but you shall not put a sickle to your neighbor's standing
grain" to make his claim that disciples are within lawful category.
·
Jesus further supports his
claim by using the incident of David and his hungry men being given the holy
bread by the priest in 1 Sam. 21:1-6.
· Jesus additionally mentions the priests who broke the Sabbath tradition
and were guiltless, as found in Lev. 24:5-9. "Jesus’ second argument is
from the Law in general (Num. 28:9-10); technically, the priests violated the
Law every Sabbath by the work that they did."[5]
· Moreover, Jesus quotes Hos.6:6, "God desires mercy and not sacrifice."
E. Issues of Historical Context
The origins of Sabbath tradition: The
Nelson's Pocket Bible dictionary explains Sabbath as "(Heb.
"Cessation") The Israelites apparently adopted the calendar of the
Canaanites...before the giving of the Ten Commandments established Sabbath as
an ordinance forever. After the resurrection of Christ on the 1st
day of the week, the day came to replace the seventh as the Christian Sabbath.
The Babylonians observed a day of rest, called Sabattu, described as a
"day of rest for the heart." On that day, it was forbidden to eat
cooked meat, to put on fresh clothes, offer sacrifices, ride in a
chariot, and the like. It fell on the seventh, 14th, 19th
21st, and 28th days of the lunar month, the 19th
day being the 49th day or the 7th week, from the 1st
of the preceding month. The Babylonian account of the Creation makes the
Creator say to the moon: "On the 7th day half thy disk; stand
upright with its first half on the Sabbath (Sabattu)."[6]
The Sabbath tradition to rest in
Ex. 20:8-11 narrative mentions God's seven-day design in Gen. 2: 2-3. God
rested on the seventh day after working six days. Therefore, the rest is wisely
commanded by God.
The Deut. 5:12-15 tradition
mentions resting on Sabbath is to undo the slavery, of the backbreaking labor
of the Egyptian task masters. God commanded a day of rest for God's distinct people
group and for all that belonged to them, including slaves, animals, land, etc.
Just as any good system can be corrupted, over the years, the guardians of the
law added more clauses than originally intended. The Pharisees selectively
'rested' on Ex.20:8-11 as in the letter of the law, literal and rigid way but
not the spirit of the law. They exercised law without mercy and without
profound understanding. Therefore, Jesus was undoing the additional
requirements. Jesus intentionally challenged the status quo by doing good on the Sabbath God's way. However, any action from Jesus on Sabbath was a problem for
the Pharisees, who had used a rigid historical tradition, controlled, and
restricted the population unnecessarily; having a culture of legalistic rules in
their social setting, to continue to be identified as a "set apart people
group" in antiquity during the exile.
F. History of Interpretation/Consequences
·
The similar narrative of Matt.
12:1-14, is found in Mk 2:23-28, 3: 1-6, and Luke 6:1-11.
·
In all the narratives, apparently,
for Pharisees, it seemed debating and even plotting to kill seemed doable on
Sabbath but not healing or satisfying hunger.
·
Although Jesus redefined
the Sabbath law, one of the Christian denominations called the Seventh Day Adventists
strictly adhere to the Sabbath law and do not go to work on Saturday.
·
Many Reformed traditions have
interpreted Sabbath keeping in such a way that people must not knit, not go out
to eat at restaurants, not go on walks or do any recreational activities on
Sundays either. Discretion would be required in this set of rules.
· A chain of restaurants remains closed on Sunday, as they want employees and others to rightfully rest on one day of the week.
III. Significance for Theology and Ministry
As rest is essential, the hearers
of that day must have been relieved to hear Jesus lighten up their load and
burden. His Yoke is easy and his burden is light.
Some observe Sabbath
and others do not. While backbreaking labor 24/7 will likely get people worn
out, being a rigid Sabbatarian can be frustrating. A day of rest once a week is
vital. The legitimate need of the hour and resources that do not conflict with
major theodicy issues are good to use. Instead of total inactivity, Jesus
advocates for merciful acts over legalistic rigidity. Today, in places like emergency
rooms, hospitals, and transportation sectors staff work round the clock on
shifts as essential services. People can be over-occupied even with religious activities. The Sabbath is made for humankind and not humans for the systemic rigid structure. Wise
moderation is the key.
Like Ehrman, we continue to
contemplate the textual inerrancy issue of Abiathar. However, some
denominations like CRC hold a view that the Bible is infallible but not inerrant.[7] "Inerrancy: The Bible is always true and
without error about every subject it addresses (added in recent decades:
"in the original manuscripts"). Infallibility: The Bible is inerrant within
the scope of its purpose."[8]
I conclude by affirming the rest one day a week as God's good design as well as with the Matthean Jesus' quote: "So it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath” (Matt.12: 12b).
[1]
Boxall, Ian. Discovering Matthew: Content, Interpretation, Reception (Discovering
Biblical Texts (DBT)) (p. 132). Eerdmans. Kindle Edition..
[2] Talbert,
Charles H.. Matthew (Paideia: Commentaries on the New Testament) (p. 151).
Baker Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.
[3] Talbert,
Charles H.. Matthew (Paideia: Commentaries on the New Testament) (pp. 152-153).
Baker Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.
[4] Ibid.
[5]
Bible.org, An Exposition on the Gospel of Matthew, 17: The Lord of the Sabbath,
(Matt.12:1-14) https://bible.org/seriespage/17-lord-sabbath-matthew-121-14,
accessed Mar.22, 2023.
[6]
Nelson's Pocket Ref. Bible Dictionary, Thomas Nelson Inc. publishers, 1999,
1978, 1964 by Nelson-National, 229-230.
[7]Stack
Exchange, Christianity, What are the differences between the CRCNA position on
infallibility and the ICBI position on inerrancy? accessed March 22, 2023. https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/53140/what-are-the-differences-between-the-crcna-position-on-infallibility-and-the-icb
[8]
Pastor Dan Roels, to the author in an email, Feb 23, 2020.
Bible.org, An Exposition of the Gospel of Matthew, 17: The Lord of the Sabbath, (Matt.12:1-14) https://bible.org/seriespage/17-lord-sabbath-matthew-121-14, accessed Mar.22, 2023.
Boxall, Ian. Discovering Matthew: Content, Interpretation, Reception (Discovering Biblical Texts (DBT) Eerdmans. Kindle Edition.
Pocket Reference Bible Dictionary. Thomas Nelson Inc. Publishers, 1999, 1978, 1964.
Stack Exchange, Christianity, What are the differences between the CRCNA position on infallibility and the ICBI position on inerrancy? Accessed March 22, 2023. https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/53140/what-are-the-differences-between-the-crcna-position-on-infallibility-and-the-icb
Talbert, Charles H.. Matthew (Paideia: Commentaries on the New Testament), Baker Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.
Ⓒ Copyrighted @Kalpana Christian Sharma.


